Connect with us

The Conservative Critic

Oscar Watch: Is White Noise worth the distraction?

Published

on

White Noise is a largely theoretical piece that is receiving awards buzz primarily for the performance of Adam Driver in the leading role and less so for the overall film. The film is meant to be intellectual and was sold to intellectuals. It was never intended for mass consumption. 

Even with the caveat that it was written and created for a niche crowd, was White Noise worth the distraction? The Conservative Critic asks: Is it entertaining? Does it have artistic/intellectual value? And is it liberal propaganda? 

The Conservative Critic Meter Check: White Noise 

Overall Rating: Not very good

Adapted from an equally theoretical postmodern novel, White Noise by Don DeLillo, White Noise is one that is meant to be chewed on. Though the dialogue in verse is a bit interesting and the performances are pretty strong, the film is so weedy and actually very ugly to look at (I don’t care if it’s on purpose it was badly done) that it’s impossible to like. Because the ideas and issues in the film have been thoroughly explored since the 1985 novel (and, frankly, quite a bit prior to the 1985 novel), the film’s intellectual center is contrived and tired with nothing new to offer. There is nothing intriguing about it and it comes off a little whiny as well as very boring. 

The liberalism is strong in the film with how strongly it is anti-religion and anti-purpose but there are some conservative elements such as the mockery of the academic elite and philosophical thinkers in general. Which is sort of ironic considering the loftiness of the story. 

Is it entertaining? 

Rating: No 

White Noise is unsalvageable and tedious. The characters speak in riddles so you can’t really get behind them at all. The random acts of drama that occur through the story are dealt with with the utmost nonchalance which really makes them hard to care about. Even if you thought that theoretical film was enjoyable, the material is so old and well explored there is no “eureka” there is nothing special to latch on to or make you feel anything. It’s an exhausting slog into an old and boring nihilistic essay. I have no idea how or why this film got made other than director Noah Baumbach’s good name really tricking people. To be fair to my consistency and perhaps my bias, I also hated Marriage Story. 

Does it have artistic/intellectual value 

Rating: Contrived and tired 

To start there is nothing groundbreaking in a story about the inevitability of death and how everything in our life is just a distraction from the fact that we’re dying. God isn’t real, love is fake, fear is invented, nothing matters blah blah blah it’s boring. I’m bored. It’s absolutely trivial garbage. The source material was written in 1985 so perhaps it was a little less exhaustingly done to death at that time but Baumbach should have considered sprucing it up a bit and maybe adding something new to the insights if he wanted to retell this story in 2022/2023. 

The entire artistic direction and cinematography of the film is God awful. Baumbach tries for a consumerist maximallism by invoking bright colors, many textures, and general chaos in every frame. But he doesn’t really do it well; it is just sort of a vomited mismatch of hideous wallpaper and bad accessories. It makes the movie sort of impossible to look at. It strives for Burton’s Edward Scissorhands era with a dash of Wes Anderson and maybe an ever so slight hint of Sofia Coppolla but it’s instead it’s just bad. It’s not good bad, just regular bad.

Adam Driver (Star Wars) is actually pretty great as Jack (especially considering the garbage material he was working with) and delivers verse in a way that I believe he may actually just talk like that all the time. The man’s pool of talent is seemingly infinite and we are standing still in the shallows. Greta Gerwig (Jackie) who is herself a more well known (and very gifted) screenwriter than actor is not great. Her Babette is not nuanced and seems mostly to just be a deer in the headlights. None of the child actors stand out. Don Cheadle (Avengers) does alright with what he has but nothing close to salvaging the thing. 

Is it liberal propaganda? 

Rating: Mostly yes; some conservative angles

Nihilism, the basic theme of the film, is intrinsically liberal and atheism is also intrinsically liberal (that’s right libertarians). The idea that there is no higher purpose or higher power is one deeply rooted in arrogance and humanism and is perpetuated by fearful small minds who cannot stand the idea they might be made to look foolish even in death. They’re the kind who have to seem like they have a hot take on everything. They don’t like normal movies, they don’t like normal music and they usually eat weirdly. They are contrarians for the sake of it and I cannot stand them and I cannot stand the exploration of their stupid, tired, boring belief system. The notion that we live for no purpose other than random satisfaction of self is tragic, boring, and a tool liberal governments often use to keep the proletariat from the hopefulness that comes with purpose. Religion is for the brave and the humble. Conservatives who believe in something more. 

On the flip side, the film pokes pretty serious fun at elite academics which is definitely more of the conservative side of the coin. So its not nothing. 

Conclusion 

White Noise is a skip. But Adam Driver to be fair is pretty good in it. 

Continue Reading
Advertisement
5 Comments

5 Comments

  1. Sarah Owens

    January 10, 2023 at 1:56 am

    I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
    🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)

    CLICK HERE====)> https://www.richsalaries.com

  2. Lisa Ross

    January 10, 2023 at 3:15 am

    Make money online from home extra cash more than $18000 to $21000. Start getting paid every month Thousands Dollars online. I have received $26000 in this month by just working online from home in my part time. every person easily do this job by.

    just Open This Website…..> https://www.Paynet2.com

  3. Anna Richards

    January 10, 2023 at 7:12 am

    I am making $90 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning $16,000 a month by working on a laptop, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply.
    Everybody must try this job now by just using this website.. http://www.Payathome7.com

  4. olivia

    January 10, 2023 at 10:27 am

    super fast money earning online job to flood the cash in your bank acc every week. from this only by working for 2 hrs a day after my college i made $17529 in my last month. i have zero experience when i joined this and in my first month i easily made $11854. so easy to do this job and regular income from this are just superb. want to join this right now? just go to this web page for more info.===))> http://www.goldonlines.com

  5. http://Www.SmartCash1.Com

    January 10, 2023 at 12:19 pm

    Since I work two shifts, two in the day and two in the evening, I honestly don’t see why more people haven’t done this. And I undoubtedly received a cheque for $29,000. I get to spend more time with my children since I work from home, which is fantastic. For further information,
    .
    .
    see this article———————————————————————————————————————>>> http://Www.SmartCash1.Com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *